One of the most noteworthy aspects of this new legislation is how Parliament has systematically incorporated key directions and principles established by the Supreme Court, particularly those outlined ...

The Hon'ble High Court held that in Category A cases under Para 3 of Satender Kumar Antil, where cognizance is taken and summons issued, “bail applications of such accused on appearance may be decided ...

Inordinate delays in trial and long periods of incarceration without conviction violate Article 21 While legislative intent must initially be adhered to, prolonged detention without trial mandates ...

The Appellant assails the order dated 28.03.2024 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad (High Court) whereby his prayer for regular bail in connection with FIR No. RC-26/2021/NIA/DLI dated ...

BNS introduces terrorism as a distinct offense under Section 113, which closely mirrors UAPA's definition. The provision covers acts intended to threaten India's unity, integrity, sovereignty, ...

Citation: 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1326,2025 INSC 810.

A recent Supreme Court ruling in Dileepbhai Nanubhai Sanghani v. State of Gujarat, citation 2025 INSC 280 dated May 14, 2025.clarifies when corruption charges can stick, protecting public servants ...

On the other hand, there is Rajasthan High Court, which in Sunil Bhatt v. State 14, held that the accused can seek a narco-analysis test at a relevant stage in view of the statutory right to lead ...

Section 66 of the BNS represents one of the most stringent provisions in Indian criminal law, addressing cases where sexual offenses under Section 64 result in either death or persistent vegetative ...

It is obvious that Section 14 is aimed at removing restrictions or limitations on the right of a female Hindu to enjoy, as a full owner, property possessed by her so long as her possession is ...

13. Additionally, the High Court in repeatedly allowing the adjournment requests has only allowed the Accused persons to deploy dilatory tactics to delay their trial and have failed to ensure that the ...

Adoption Deed was registered, the presumption under Section 16 of the Act of 1956 attached to it and it was for Defendant No.1 to rebut that presumption. We find that he did so more than sufficiently.